Guide

Running school admissions online

Last updated 28 August 2026

Admissions is the one process every school runs and almost none run twice the same way. Forms are printed in January, filled in by hand, carried back by a parent, keyed into a spreadsheet by whoever is free, and then reconciled against an exam register that was typed separately. By the time offers go out, three people are holding three different lists and at least one applicant has been lost between them.

Moving admissions online is not really about the form. It is about making one record per applicant that survives from first enquiry to final offer, so nobody has to reconcile anything.

The three shapes an admission can take

Before choosing software, decide which of these your school actually runs - because they need different things and most schools assume the first without checking:

Pick this deliberately. A system that assumes "form then exam" forces a school doing walk-in exams to invent a fake application for every applicant, and forces a nursery to schedule a paper nobody will sit. If the software cannot be told which shape you use, it will be worked around - and worked-around software stops being trusted.

What an online admission form has to do that paper does not

Turning a paper form into a web form is the easy half. The parts that actually save work are the ones paper never had:

Running the entrance exam without a computer lab

The assumption that an online entrance exam needs a room full of desktops is what stops most Nigerian schools from trying. It does not. Every applicant is already carrying a device, or their parent is.

Practical arrangements that work:

Essays change the timetable, not the format. An essay question cannot be auto-marked reliably, whatever a system claims. If your paper has written answers, plan for a marking step between submission and results - and make sure the software can hold results back until a teacher has actually looked. Publishing a machine's guess at an essay score is worse than publishing nothing.

Deciding, and telling people

The decision itself is the school's, but the recording of it is where admissions usually falls apart. Three things worth insisting on:

  1. The score and the decision are separate. A pass mark is an input to a decision, not the decision. Record them apart, or you will not be able to explain an admitted applicant who scored below the line - and there is always one.
  2. Every applicant reaches a terminal state. Admitted, rejected, or withdrawn. "No decision recorded" three months later is how a school ends up re-contacting someone who enrolled elsewhere in February.
  3. An admitted applicant becomes a student without re-typing. This is the entire payoff. If admission does not flow into enrolment, you have digitised the form and kept all the work.

A realistic order to do this in

  1. Decide which of the three shapes you actually run.
  2. Put the form online first, even if the exam stays on paper for a cycle. Most of the reconciliation pain is in the form, not the exam.
  3. Run one entrance exam online with a small, low-stakes group - a feeder class, or a resit - before the main intake.
  4. Only then move the whole cycle. An admissions season is the worst possible time to discover a new process.

Schools that follow roughly this order end up with one list that everyone agrees on, and an admissions season that does not require a war room.

Running a school in Nigeria?
DasticOS handles admissions, attendance, results, fees and timetables in one place.
See how it works

More guides